One of my friends, who is a sports writer for a Portland newspaper, recently told me he’d been assigned to profile a high school athlete who’d overcome leukemia in grade school to become his high school baseball team’s MVP.
When I heard his assignment, I issued him a challenge: write the entire article without using a single military analogy.
He didn’t understand, so I elaborated: It seems that everyone who talks about cancer, chemo, etc., feels obligated to compare cancer to combat.
You receive the devastating diagnosis of cancer, the elusive, silent invader. Then you “battle it.” You “fight” for your life. You “wage war” against the malignant cells. You and your oncologist draw up a “strategy” to “beat” the disease. And if you’re unlucky and you “lose the battle to cancer,” at least you will have “battled” cancer “bravely.”
It is rumored that Spartan mothers used to tell their sons before a battle that they’d better, “Return with your shield or on it.” (implying that they’d better return as heroes or fallen heroes. if they returned as captives or without their shields, they’d be seen as cowards).
Back in modern America, only in the sarcastic pseudo-newspaper The Onion has anyone ever been described as “losing a cowardly battle to cancer.” Cancer patients are always brave. They always fight. Having cancer is always a battle.
I don’t yet understand why cancer is the only disease that’s described in such militant terms. But I’ve yet to read about someone who “fought” against COPD. No one I know has “battled” diabetes. I’ve never read an obituary in which the deceased “bravely” defied heart disease or “lost a five year battle with old age.”
Recently, Tony Snow died of colon cancer. (Or, “lost a brave three year battle with colon cancer,” as the current vernacular would have it.) When I heard the news, my heart sank. I always felt somehow connected to him, because Mr. Snow was diagnosed with a recurrence of his colon cancer at the same time I was diagnosed with a recurrence of breast cancer, and we went through chemo simultaneously last summer.
Call it survivor’s guilt or whatever you will, but when I heard that he died, and I still have a clean bill of health, I was deeply saddened.
I googled his name on the Internet, and came upon an interview done with David Gregory this spring. Mr. Snow allowed Mr. Gregory to not only interview him, but also to follow him to a chemo session. While he was sitting in a room getting ready to receive another chemo infusion, Mr. Snow told Mr. Gregory that he was going to beat this cancer. He said that when you have cancer, if you buy yourself two or three years, you’ve bought yourself a decade because medicine is always making advances. He said when he was diagnosed he told his children not to worry. He promised them he’d be bouncing their children on his knee.
When he died, his three children were 10-15 years old. They didn’t have their own children, and Mr. Snow did not bounce them on his knee.
And it made me wonder why he gave that quote to Mr. Gregory, after he already knew that his cancer had metastisized and that his chances of even surviving one year were slim to none.
It’s the same thought I have when I hear of cancer patients who undergo an experimental cancer treatment that may extend their life for 4-6 weeks, at best. Do these patients really want to prolong their debilitating pain? Are they so afraid of death they’d rather go through another month of hell than die sooner and put the agony behind them?
I don’t know the answer, but my suspicion is that as a culture we’ve created a language and a mentality about cancer that propels cancer patients to keep up the apperance of “fighting” long after they’ve acknowledged the inevitable end of the disease. Society tells cancer patients to return from their arduous journey “with your shield or on it.” Either you beat the disease, or you lose a brave battle to it. There is no white flag. There is no surrender. There is no “making your peace” with cancer and submitting to it. You either go down fighting, or, as in the celebrated case of Lance Armstrong, you don’t go down at all.
All of this explains why I didn’t even know that there was an antonym for the word “invincible” until I started writing this piece.
As it turns out, “vincible,” the opposite of invincible, is actually a word. This forbidden 8-letter word is in the dictionary.
But terminal cancer patients will be forced to continue their “brave battles” until “vincible” enters our vocabularies. And maybe, our consciences.